![]() Some highlights from new reports, which cover Jan. Some politicians appear to already be abiding by the new law, or at least curtailing spending that has a questionable relationship to campaigning or lacks transparency for the public. More: Bryant signs campaign finance reform into law The new law came after an ongoing investigative report by The Clarion-Ledger, "Public Office/Private Gain," illustrated how the state's lax campaign finance laws and nearly nonexistent enforcement had created a tax-free second income for many Mississippi politicians, mostly funded by special interests. To get around reporting all spending of $200 or more, some politicians have used credit cards, and only reported payments to the card companies, not purchases. They paid for automobiles, apartments, clothes, children's parties, groceries, taxes, car insurance, home improvements and trips to Alaska, California, Colorado and Florida, among other places. Mississippi politicians in recent years - in a practice some called "legalized bribery" - spent special interest money run through their campaigns on personal expenses. 31 - politicians can spend that essentially as they please, subject to tax regulations. They don't apply to money raised through Dec. These reforms include restrictions on personal use of campaign money and will require more transparency in reporting, moving forward. State officials have submitted campaign finance reports that were due Wednesday covering 2017, the last reports before reforms the Legislature passed last year take effect. Stephen Horne, although reported as late in filing by the secretary of state's office, has not accepted campaign donations since 2011 and terminated his account in 2015. Constitutional Commentary, Forthcoming, Harvard Public Law Working Paper No.UPDATED: Includes comments from the secretary of state and Ethics director, and information that Rep. Nicholas Stephanopoulos, The Sweep of the Electoral Power (October 20, 2020). 2020-23, GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. Spencer Overton, Power to Regulate Social Media Companies to Prevent Voter Suppression. 48 Florida State University Law Review 61 (2021) ![]() Justin Levitt, Failed Elections and the Legislative Selection of Electors, _ N.Y.U. 20-0002, New York University Law Review, Forthcoming Krishnakumar, Cracking the Whole Code Rule (February 19, 2020). Ohio State Legal Studies Research Paper No. Foley, Requiring Majority Winners for Congressional Elections: Harnessing Federalism to Combat Extremism (May 10, 2021). Zhang, A Reasonable Bias Approach to Gerrymandering: Using Automated Plan Generation to Evaluate Redistricting Proposals, 59 Wm. Tabatha Abu El-Haj, Networking the Party: First Amendment Rights & the Pursuit of Responsive Party Government, 118 Colum. More op-eds and commentaries by Rick › Recent Academic Articles and Working Papers by Rick Hasen ![]() ![]() ![]() No One is Coming to Save Us from the ‘Dagger at the Throat of America,’ N.Y. What Democrats Need From Mitch McConnell to Make an Election Reform Deal Worth It, Slate, Jan. North Carolina Republicans Ask SCOTUS To Decimate Voting Rights in Every State, Slate, Feb. How to Keep the Rising Tide of Fake News from Drowning Our Democracy, N.Y. How Supreme Court Radicalism Could Threaten Democracy Itself, Slate, Mar. But He’s Still a Danger, Washington Post, Mar. The One Group That Can Stop Elon Musk from Unbanning Trump on Twitter, Slate, May 10, 2022įacebook and Twitter Could Let Trump Back Online. 6 Committee Should Be Looking Ahead to Election Threats in 2024, Wash. No One is Above the Law, and that Starts with Donald Trump, N.Y. It’s Hard to Overstate the Danger of the Voting Case the Supreme Court Just Agreed to Hear, Slate, June 30, 2022 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |